<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Markoff&#8217;s Gated Community Should Die in a Fire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://push.cx/2009/markoffs-gated-community/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://push.cx/2009/markoffs-gated-community</link>
	<description>A traveling geek&#039;s blog on development, games, and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Harkins</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2009/markoffs-gated-community/comment-page-1#comment-90662</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/?p=697#comment-90662</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s changed is that they&#039;re not trying to build their own walled gardens, they&#039;re trying to fence in the commons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s changed is that they&#8217;re not trying to build their own walled gardens, they&#8217;re trying to fence in the commons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carey</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2009/markoffs-gated-community/comment-page-1#comment-90661</link>
		<dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/?p=697#comment-90661</guid>
		<description>As you mentioned, these ideas are not new, and they failed before, so I expect them to fail now.  Unless something has changed substantially, but if that&#039;s the case, what&#039;s changed?  I&#039;m not losing sleep over it quite yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you mentioned, these ideas are not new, and they failed before, so I expect them to fail now.  Unless something has changed substantially, but if that&#8217;s the case, what&#8217;s changed?  I&#8217;m not losing sleep over it quite yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

