<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Specificity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://push.cx/2006/specificity/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://push.cx/2006/specificity</link>
	<description>A traveling geek&#039;s blog on development, games, and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Helps</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/specificity/comment-page-1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Helps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/79#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to suggest &quot;to illaterate,&quot; from il- for &quot;without, missing,&quot;  -lat(er)- for &quot;side, thing that goes along&quot; (taken figuratively as attachment, and similar to the word lateral), and -ate, which means &quot;to become associated with.&quot; Literally &quot;to become associated with a missing attachment,&quot; or to send an e-mail without an attachment. I also like the similarity to &quot;illiterate,&quot; which gives it a nice connotation. For clarity, I propose pronouncing it something like:

ill - LATE - er - it

That is, second syllable stress, with only the stressed vowel being long and the last syllable being clipped.

&quot;Oh, man, I illaterated again! I swear I&#039;ll never do it again!&quot; (verb intransitive)
&quot;What kind of illaterating fool are you?&quot; (gerund)
&quot;I always seem to illaterate these mailing lists posts.&quot; (verb transitive)
&quot;I&#039;d love to read your dissertation on alliteration, but you need to work on the illateration first.&quot; (nominalization)

The similarity to &quot;illiterate&quot; makes me want to use it as an adjective, but I don&#039;t know what exactly is should mean then. Whatever. Back to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to suggest &#8220;to illaterate,&#8221; from il- for &#8220;without, missing,&#8221;  -lat(er)- for &#8220;side, thing that goes along&#8221; (taken figuratively as attachment, and similar to the word lateral), and -ate, which means &#8220;to become associated with.&#8221; Literally &#8220;to become associated with a missing attachment,&#8221; or to send an e-mail without an attachment. I also like the similarity to &#8220;illiterate,&#8221; which gives it a nice connotation. For clarity, I propose pronouncing it something like:</p>
<p>ill &#8211; LATE &#8211; er &#8211; it</p>
<p>That is, second syllable stress, with only the stressed vowel being long and the last syllable being clipped.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh, man, I illaterated again! I swear I&#8217;ll never do it again!&#8221; (verb intransitive)<br />
&#8220;What kind of illaterating fool are you?&#8221; (gerund)<br />
&#8220;I always seem to illaterate these mailing lists posts.&#8221; (verb transitive)<br />
&#8220;I&#8217;d love to read your dissertation on alliteration, but you need to work on the illateration first.&#8221; (nominalization)</p>
<p>The similarity to &#8220;illiterate&#8221; makes me want to use it as an adjective, but I don&#8217;t know what exactly is should mean then. Whatever. Back to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

