<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sociable Is The New Black</title>
	<atom:link href="http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black</link>
	<description>A traveling geek&#039;s blog on development, games, and the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:41:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Bookmarks - Bad for Blogs? at Content Quake</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-9723</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Bookmarks - Bad for Blogs? at Content Quake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-9723</guid>
		<description>[...] I think I side with Rand on this more than the others, and the three above are not the only ones talking about it either. Social bookmarking icons on blogs to me are a positive thing. It allows readers to virally get the word out about an article to an unlimited number of readers. If I like an article and send it to 10 people via email, and they send it to 20 others, chances are it will not be seen by nearly as many as if the article got 20 diggs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I think I side with Rand on this more than the others, and the three above are not the only ones talking about it either. Social bookmarking icons on blogs to me are a positive thing. It allows readers to virally get the word out about an article to an unlimited number of readers. If I like an article and send it to 10 people via email, and they send it to 20 others, chances are it will not be seen by nearly as many as if the article got 20 diggs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Maggard</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-9596</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Maggard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 03:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-9596</guid>
		<description>I don&#8217;t use Sociable on the blogs I&#8217;m responsible for, but do appreciate it&#8217;s function. I&#8217;ve even clicked on Sociable-supplied inks a few times to add to my own bookmarks.

And yes, misuse/overuse of Sociable, like over anything else, can indeed become &#8220;NASCAR&#8221;-y.

Moving all to default gray scale is certainly one way to harmonize the visual cacophony, but then you run into the issue of grays not looking right with the rest of the blog. So what about offering custom palettes?

PNG files are compact, offer the alpha-transparency some of the icons seem to use, and have (relatively) easy to edit color tables. I realize it&#8217;s a significantly more complex matter to custom recolor the icons but the results would indeed be harmonious. 

Enter in the colors being used on the website, click generate, and enjoy the now harmonized icons. 

Tables of intermediate &amp; closest-approximation colors are trivial to generate and yield impressive, generally attractive, results. Sure the Delicious icon wouldn&#8217;t be a black &amp; blue checkerboard but now a teal &amp; beige one (until hovered over), so what? These icons are house guests on a blog and should be reasonable about their accommodations.

Of course you&#8217;d be relying on external image processing libraries being present on the local systems, something that isn&#8217;t going to be universal. A work-around would be offering a service on the Sociable homepage to automagically generate icon packs for folks. Asking for a $5 donation would likely cover the increased overhead, possibly even cover all of the hosting bills.

Again, it&#8217;d be a lot more complexity, but the result would be making so many blogs look nicer.

(Thinking about it, a clever Photoshop or Fireworks user should be able to write a script to do all of this within those or like applications. Anyone up for it?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use Sociable on the blogs I&#8217;m responsible for, but do appreciate it&#8217;s function. I&#8217;ve even clicked on Sociable-supplied inks a few times to add to my own bookmarks.</p>
<p>And yes, misuse/overuse of Sociable, like over anything else, can indeed become &#8220;NASCAR&#8221;-y.</p>
<p>Moving all to default gray scale is certainly one way to harmonize the visual cacophony, but then you run into the issue of grays not looking right with the rest of the blog. So what about offering custom palettes?</p>
<p>PNG files are compact, offer the alpha-transparency some of the icons seem to use, and have (relatively) easy to edit color tables. I realize it&#8217;s a significantly more complex matter to custom recolor the icons but the results would indeed be harmonious. </p>
<p>Enter in the colors being used on the website, click generate, and enjoy the now harmonized icons. </p>
<p>Tables of intermediate &amp; closest-approximation colors are trivial to generate and yield impressive, generally attractive, results. Sure the Delicious icon wouldn&#8217;t be a black &amp; blue checkerboard but now a teal &amp; beige one (until hovered over), so what? These icons are house guests on a blog and should be reasonable about their accommodations.</p>
<p>Of course you&#8217;d be relying on external image processing libraries being present on the local systems, something that isn&#8217;t going to be universal. A work-around would be offering a service on the Sociable homepage to automagically generate icon packs for folks. Asking for a $5 donation would likely cover the increased overhead, possibly even cover all of the hosting bills.</p>
<p>Again, it&#8217;d be a lot more complexity, but the result would be making so many blogs look nicer.</p>
<p>(Thinking about it, a clever Photoshop or Fireworks user should be able to write a script to do all of this within those or like applications. Anyone up for it?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eduo</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-9566</link>
		<dc:creator>Eduo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 23:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-9566</guid>
		<description>I had the sociable plugin active for a while. I decided to take it away because it was confusing even myself in my own posts.

After thinking it over I have to agree that giving the option of hiding them so only people that know about them can see them would be a great option.

This can already be done by anyone with a medium knowledge of html and a javascript toggle function that affects a small block (or using a :hover CSS  style to show the content, but we know how those work in some browsers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the sociable plugin active for a while. I decided to take it away because it was confusing even myself in my own posts.</p>
<p>After thinking it over I have to agree that giving the option of hiding them so only people that know about them can see them would be a great option.</p>
<p>This can already be done by anyone with a medium knowledge of html and a javascript toggle function that affects a small block (or using a :hover CSS  style to show the content, but we know how those work in some browsers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-9473</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 11:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-9473</guid>
		<description>&quot;Its far easier to cut something down than create.&quot;

Wrong, its easier to shove things in than to make the difficult choice to leave something out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Its far easier to cut something down than create.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wrong, its easier to shove things in than to make the difficult choice to leave something out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrin</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-4607</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-4607</guid>
		<description>I am sorry if this is the wrong place for this comment. I, however, did not know where to post it. I excitedly installed your plugin on my stepfather&#039;s site that I manage for him. It, however, interferes with the magpier plugin.The exact error messeage is:

&quot;Fatal error: Cannot redeclare parse_w3cdtf() (previously declared in /home/watching/public_html/wp-includes/rss-functions.php:772) in /home/watching/public_html/wp-content/plugins/kiwi/includes/magpierss/rss_utils.inc on line 2&quot;

Any clue on how to fix this?  The site is watchingpolitcs.com. When I activate sociable, my &quot;elsewhere links&quot; disappear. The theme I use is a modifed version of Kiwi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry if this is the wrong place for this comment. I, however, did not know where to post it. I excitedly installed your plugin on my stepfather&#8217;s site that I manage for him. It, however, interferes with the magpier plugin.The exact error messeage is:</p>
<p>&#8220;Fatal error: Cannot redeclare parse_w3cdtf() (previously declared in /home/watching/public_html/wp-includes/rss-functions.php:772) in /home/watching/public_html/wp-content/plugins/kiwi/includes/magpierss/rss_utils.inc on line 2&#8243;</p>
<p>Any clue on how to fix this?  The site is watchingpolitcs.com. When I activate sociable, my &#8220;elsewhere links&#8221; disappear. The theme I use is a modifed version of Kiwi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley Science Writer</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-3647</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley Science Writer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-3647</guid>
		<description>I like this plugin, I&#039;ve hacked it a little and will certainly upgrade to get the &quot;greyed out&quot; version.

By the way, what are the most popule SBS? Digg, Del.icio.us Fark, Yahoo!

Right/Wrong (del as applic.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this plugin, I&#8217;ve hacked it a little and will certainly upgrade to get the &#8220;greyed out&#8221; version.</p>
<p>By the way, what are the most popule SBS? Digg, Del.icio.us Fark, Yahoo!</p>
<p>Right/Wrong (del as applic.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobsLog</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-2646</link>
		<dc:creator>BobsLog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-2646</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social Networking...&lt;/strong&gt;

A plugin to help in this area is available. It is the second &#8220;available here&#8221; that is clickable(Im learning, but this doesn&#8217;t come easially)
available here

......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social Networking&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A plugin to help in this area is available. It is the second &#8220;available here&#8221; that is clickable(Im learning, but this doesn&#8217;t come easially)<br />
available here</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobsLog</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-2647</link>
		<dc:creator>BobsLog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-2647</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social Networking...&lt;/strong&gt;

A plugin to help in this area is available. It is the second &#8220;available here&#8221; that is clickable(Im learning, but this doesn&#8217;t come easially)
available here

......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social Networking&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A plugin to help in this area is available. It is the second &#8220;available here&#8221; that is clickable(Im learning, but this doesn&#8217;t come easially)<br />
available here</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Changing Way &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social Bookmark Icons</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Changing Way &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social Bookmark Icons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 04:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-310</guid>
		<description>[...] In fact, there is a WordPress plugin: Sociable. And Paul Harkin, its author, has posted the refreshing statement that &#8220;lots of links to social bookmarking sites at the end of your posts are ugly.&#8221; Good for him. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In fact, there is a WordPress plugin: Sociable. And Paul Harkin, its author, has posted the refreshing statement that &#8220;lots of links to social bookmarking sites at the end of your posts are ugly.&#8221; Good for him. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Networking - Bobs Niched Blog</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Networking - Bobs Niched Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-283</guid>
		<description>[...] A plugin to help in this area is available [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A plugin to help in this area is available [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the r-blog &#187; Social Bookmarking, and WordPress</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>the r-blog &#187; Social Bookmarking, and WordPress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-114</guid>
		<description>[...] They&#8217;re Distracting and Weird-looking, Those Icons Yes. Yes, they are, aren&#8217;t they? All different colors, designs, styles. What is a self-respecting blogger to do? One guy made the images grayscale until you hovered over them. Peter Harkin, the author of Sociable, notes that he&#8217;s going to include this feature in the next version. However, I think I like my solution better. I&#8217;ve made the icons semi-transparent until you hover over them. That way, they still have their identifying colors, but they recede into my design a bit more. Let me know what you think! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They&#8217;re Distracting and Weird-looking, Those Icons Yes. Yes, they are, aren&#8217;t they? All different colors, designs, styles. What is a self-respecting blogger to do? One guy made the images grayscale until you hovered over them. Peter Harkin, the author of Sociable, notes that he&#8217;s going to include this feature in the next version. However, I think I like my solution better. I&#8217;ve made the icons semi-transparent until you hover over them. That way, they still have their identifying colors, but they recede into my design a bit more. Let me know what you think! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maxpower</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>maxpower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 04:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Peter, almost everything people do on the net is critique.  Weigh in with their opinions.  Screw them.  You have created something.  Its far easier to cut something down than create.  Empowering people by giving them options is a wonderful thing.

Your question as to which sites to include is a valid one.  The answer in my mind is clear: only the popular sites.  Young startups shouldn&#039;t be included unless they are popular.  You decide, its your baby.  

So assume you have every single SBS in the list.  You don&#039;t have to have them all enabled by default.  Enable only the most important.  Perhaps only Digg and del.icio.us.  This might be the happy meduim.

Initially, when we first started talking, I had envisioned a companion page on social bookmarking sites to advise various website owners as to which SBS they should use.  I have been diligently working away on such a page from Sociable V0.01 (the hideous hack ver ;)), describing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.maxpower.ca/bookmarking/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;social bookmarking&lt;/a&gt; and would love feedback as well.  Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, almost everything people do on the net is critique.  Weigh in with their opinions.  Screw them.  You have created something.  Its far easier to cut something down than create.  Empowering people by giving them options is a wonderful thing.</p>
<p>Your question as to which sites to include is a valid one.  The answer in my mind is clear: only the popular sites.  Young startups shouldn&#8217;t be included unless they are popular.  You decide, its your baby.  </p>
<p>So assume you have every single SBS in the list.  You don&#8217;t have to have them all enabled by default.  Enable only the most important.  Perhaps only Digg and del.icio.us.  This might be the happy meduim.</p>
<p>Initially, when we first started talking, I had envisioned a companion page on social bookmarking sites to advise various website owners as to which SBS they should use.  I have been diligently working away on such a page from Sociable V0.01 (the hideous hack ver ;)), describing <a href="http://www.maxpower.ca/bookmarking/" rel="nofollow">social bookmarking</a> and would love feedback as well.  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillyG</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>BillyG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 03:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-84</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had this loaded since the first day you came out with it and once setting it to the multiple icons that I have, I haven&#039;t looked back. It sounds like you are griping at everybody for using it that doesn&#039;t have just a few icons like yourself. To me, that&#039;s what diversity an choices are all about, I don&#039;t understand what the problem is.

I would love to see it greyed out unless it was hovered over, that takes care of different theme&#039;s color pallettes and makes it a little fancy at the same time, great idea. 

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had this loaded since the first day you came out with it and once setting it to the multiple icons that I have, I haven&#8217;t looked back. It sounds like you are griping at everybody for using it that doesn&#8217;t have just a few icons like yourself. To me, that&#8217;s what diversity an choices are all about, I don&#8217;t understand what the problem is.</p>
<p>I would love to see it greyed out unless it was hovered over, that takes care of different theme&#8217;s color pallettes and makes it a little fancy at the same time, great idea. </p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel C</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 06:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,

Thanks for your response.  I should clarify that I still think your plugin is useful.  A lot of people really *want* social bookmarking icons on their blogs and while I think they seem cluttersome, others won&#039;t :)

You make it really easy for those people to have that feature on their blog - your plugin is well-written.

Cheers
Rachel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>Thanks for your response.  I should clarify that I still think your plugin is useful.  A lot of people really *want* social bookmarking icons on their blogs and while I think they seem cluttersome, others won&#8217;t :)</p>
<p>You make it really easy for those people to have that feature on their blog &#8211; your plugin is well-written.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Rachel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black/comment-page-1#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://push.cx/2006/sociable-is-the-new-black#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve &lt;a href=&quot;http://tossr.com/2006/04/05/the-sociable-tossr/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;just added Sociable to my blog&lt;/a&gt; but moved the icons into the &quot;These icons link to social bookmarking sites...&quot; box, which does a good job of making the clutter invisible -- until you hover over the tagline, anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve <a href="http://tossr.com/2006/04/05/the-sociable-tossr/" rel="nofollow">just added Sociable to my blog</a> but moved the icons into the &#8220;These icons link to social bookmarking sites&#8230;&#8221; box, which does a good job of making the clutter invisible &#8212; until you hover over the tagline, anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

